Comparing Common Approaches to GCC High Migration
Organizations that work with U.S. government contracts or handle sensitive regulated data often face tough decisions about their cloud strategy. Two common approaches for meeting requirements are migrating all users to a dedicated Microsoft GCC High tenant or creating a secure enclave and migrating only select users. This blog post explores the differences between these two strategies, highlighting the pros and cons of each so you can make an informed decision for your organization.
Microsoft GCC High (Government Community Cloud High) is a dedicated cloud environment designed specifically for U.S. government agencies and contractors that must comply with strict regulatory standards, such as FedRAMP High, ITAR, and DFARS when handling controlled unclassified information (CUI). GCC High provides enhanced controls, data residency in the continental United States, and a dedicated infrastructure that separates government data from commercial environments.
A secure enclave is a segmented environment within an organization's broader IT infrastructure that is designed to isolate and protect sensitive data. In the context of Microsoft 365, this typically means creating a separate tenant (such as GCC High) and migrating only those users who need to handle regulated government data, while the rest of the organization remains in the standard commercial cloud.
Migrating the entire organization to a GCC High tenant means every user, mailbox, and data source is moved to the dedicated government cloud environment. This approach is often chosen by organizations whose operations are deeply intertwined with government contracts, or when regulatory requirements affect the majority of their workforce.
With a secure enclave approach, only users who need access to regulated data are migrated to GCC High, while others remain in the commercial cloud. This creates a dual environment, where certain workflows and communications are segmented between the enclave and the main tenant.
|
Aspect |
Full GCC High Tenant |
Secure Enclave |
|
Scope |
All users and data |
Only select users/data |
|
Cost |
Higher (all users require GCC High licenses) |
Lower (only critical users require GCC High licenses) |
|
IT Complexity |
Standardizes environment management |
Creates dual environments; more complex |
|
Compliance |
Uniform compliance |
Compliance limited to enclave users |
|
Feature Availability |
Some commercial features may be missing |
Non-enclave users retain commercial features |
|
Disruption |
Higher (entire org migrates) |
Lower (fewer users migrate) |
The decision between a full GCC High tenant migration and creating a secure enclave depends on your organization’s regulatory obligations, budget, operational needs, and user workflows. Organizations with extensive compliance needs or those seeking a straightforward process may prefer a full migration, while those with limited regulated data exposure may benefit from the enclave strategy.
Both migration strategies have their place, and choosing the right one requires a careful assessment of your security, compliance, and business needs. Consult with your IT and compliance teams, and consider engaging with Daymark to guide your migration journey. Contact us here.